In the Name of the Most High
So, I got a link in my email to an interesting site: http://jezebel.com/5390228/disney-princesses-rely-on-good-looks-little-people–men-for-salvation
It’s not the first time that I’ve heard this theory that Disney princess characterizations are harmful to little girls due to the fact that the princesses are projecting images of being weak and demure, and relying totally and completely on men for their salvation. I actually read through a lot of the comments on the site and did a search on this, and read through some other comments about this very topic (too much time on my hands? maybe… but what else am I supposed to do when I can’t sleep at 5 AM? hehe). Anyway, my personal thoughts on Disney princesses and female heroines are complex, and I think I am that way because I waver between “traditional” and “modern” definitions of womanhood. For example, I don’t feel that women are somehow limited in life if they do not have a career and instead focus on their domestic life (I think such sacrifice is quite rare and beautiful in a self-obsessed and self-indulgent society like ours). However, I get turned off by the sexualization of women and the depiction of women as naive little girls who need a prince to save them… a prince who values them for their beauty above all else.
Women who consider themselves to be feminist are usually the ones who write their critiques and analyses of Disney women, and since I do not fall into that category, I find myself only half agreeing with what they say, and getting annoying by their one-dimensional view of womanhood as well. So what are my thoughts? Well, I think what annoys me the most in all these movies is that the princesses/heroines are all beautiful and explicitly valued only for their beauty. Don’t get me wrong: I have nothing against aesthetics and beauty. But, when this trait is so overly emphasized and narrowly defined, it can become problematic. In an age where aging is equated with ugliness, plastic surgeries are considered completely acceptable, and the fashion industry is defining beauty for us… we hardly need this over emphasis. Also, all these princesses were considered to be very beautiful by their entire societies… there was no questioning their beauty, even if they were considered “strange” (e.g., Belle). In the case of Belle, the most “handsome” man in town still wanted her, providing validation that she was universally accepted as beautiful even though she was also intelligent. So, I find this a little disturbing, given that beauty comes in all shapes and sizes… and given that it is perfectly OKAY to have a different taste in beauty than someone else (which all the movies ignore). Instead, these women are overly sexualized and not always modest in their style of clothing! I mean, seriously… do we really need to see Jasmine’s entire body to remind ourselves of how beautiful she is?
Some of the readers on the website make comments such as “well, these princesses stood up to their patriarchal fathers and went after their own loves” etc etc. Personally, I do not find this to be a quality that is deserving of praise. Ariel’s father was concerned for her safety and was protecting his 16-year-old daughter. Jasmine’s father had only her happiness in mind when wanting her to marry, and he was fine with her rejecting suitors. These naive girls were rebellious for no good reason, and the underlying assumption in all these movies is that parental figures don’t really know what’s best for their daughters. But, somehow, a 16 year old girl knows best and should actively pursue men who would never have paid attention to them otherwise. Chasing after a “love” and sacrificing family and all those that love you for such naive impulses is scary and, quite frankly, stupid. This whole idea of being able to “fall in love” so quickly and then being ready to sacrifice everything in pursuit of that love, sends all the wrong messages to little girls about what love actually is and what it entails. I have never bought into the “love conquers all” motif so prevalent in this country and so apparent in every movie, book, or other cultural expression. In fact, I do not think that Love Conquers All and that logic should be thrown out the window when a young girl sees an attractive and mysterious man. This culture is very influenced by the idea that people can fall in love quickly and mostly based on superficial meetings that mean very little. Imagine if Prince Eric had never fallen in love with Ariel- what a disaster that story would have been, and at what cost?
I feel a little torn by the theme that irks so many: “the princesses live happily ever after because they fell in love and got married”. I think that many feminists are annoyed by this message that somehow falling in love and getting married will solve all of women’s problems. Furthermore, they get annoyed that the prince needed to marry them in order for them to find happiness. I can understand their argument to a degree, but I guess this is where the anti-feminist in me comes alive. I personally find no problem in aspiring to be a wife and mother… and finding complete happiness in a marriage without any need for something else. Perhaps that is a big old fashioned of me- but I happen to think that society would be a lot better off if many women were able to see the importance of how important marriage and family life is to their happiness. Individual family units are the very building blocks to a society.. without the building block, the foundation, being stable and happy, we will run into all sorts of problems in society. But, what I do get upset about is how much these women so quickly wanted to sacrifice without any promise or commitment from their men. There was no ring on their finger, and yet they were ready to sacrifice all for a man they did not know, and who certainly was not committed to them. Of course, not all their stories are alike- Belle, for instance, was heavily pursued and she held herself steady until the end. However, in most of the other situations, this was not the case. How did Cinderella know that her Prince Charming would not treat her with the same disrespect as her stepmother and stepsisters? How did Sleeping Beauty know that her Prince was not a master of deception as well- just because he could dance and sing, it surely doesn’t mean that he was going to be positive in her life (and she was a girl who was easily fooled, given the whole spindle wheel thing). I guess what I am arguing would make feminists even more angry: women should not be so eager to pursue love and should not commit to anything unless they have received the following clear signals from men- 1) The men are clearly good and will not abuse them in any way, 2) The men also have shown some sort of interest in them, 3) The men are worth some sort of effort. And, this can not be done in one romantic meeting where the couple dances until midnight and realize they are in love with each other. Otherwise, I have no problem with the marriage “and they all lived happily ever after” theme.
Oh, and do not get me started on the fact that the men “saved” the women from their fate. I am completely with the feminists on this one. The portrayal of these stupid yet beautiful women who made mistakes and needed the assistance of the handsome prince to save them… oh, gosh, writing that out made me nauseated in itself.
I want to discuss Belle because she does seem to be the one princess that I can tolerate. The biggest criticism against her is that she fell in love with a man who abused her and stayed in a relationship that was obviously unhealthy. That if a good and patient woman stays with a man long enough, she can “change” him. I can understand and agree to a certain extent. But, I guess my counterargument is that she never really fell in love with him until the very, very end. She was not in a “relationship” with him by any means… she was coping with a situation and trying to make the best of it. In fact, if she had fallen in love with him earlier, he would have been saved earlier (i.e., transformed to a prince)… but it was not until the very end that she even realized she had feelings for him at all. She had no expectations he would change so that she could marry him and live happily ever after… in fact, she left him to go back to her father. He was the one sacrificing at the end everything he had for her… and she was still somewhat on the fence. She changed him, not because she wanted to marry him, but because she was kind and knew how to make the best of a situation that was dismal. I guess. (Still have not completely made up my mind about this). But, in the end, of course she was most valued for her beauty and it was her beauty that validated her existence. It is okay to fall in love with a man who is not universally handsome, but the women should always be beautiful by EVERYONE’S standards.
So, will I let my daughters watch Disney cartoons? After all, I LOVED these movies growing up, and I think I turned out alright? Maybe I’m reading too much into these movies? This may be the case, but I am still worried about what messages I want to send to my daughter, even subconsciously, about what a woman is and what she should value in her life. I don’t want her to view her father as an obstacle to her one true love in life. Or I don’t want her to believe that unless society as a whole accepts her as beautiful, she is otherwise ugly. I don’t know. I guess we’ll see.